|
Post by UniversalAris on Mar 1, 2017 9:11:46 GMT -8
There are key immigration discussions in the United States today. One issue is whether allowing immigrants from unstable countries is acceptable or unacceptable. The key issues are that people in these countries are suffering and needing help, but are being blocked from the freedoms that the U.S. enjoys. On the other hand there are insufficient documentation for immigrant refugees, so the U.S. could, potentially, be inviting dangerous people into the country. Is banning immigration from unstable countries acceptable? Do civilians have to live with the consequences of the dangerous among them? Is there an alternative to keeping dangerous people out of the country without denying access to the civilians that need help? Please respond with your ideas on the subject and build upon others.
|
|
LSDMB
Citizen
Christian Trinitarian Universalist
Posts: 15
|
Post by LSDMB on May 3, 2017 10:05:58 GMT -8
I think we should keep our current immigration policy personally. We don't need to make the process of immigration any more difficult or our vetting really any more rigorous than it already is, however at the same time we also shouldn't adopt a european model given the troubles countries like Germany and Sweden are currently facing.
|
|
|
Post by UniversalAris on May 3, 2017 12:02:07 GMT -8
I think we should keep our current immigration policy personally. We don't need to make the process of immigration any more difficult or our vetting really any more rigorous than it already is, however at the same time we also shouldn't adopt a european model given the troubles countries like Germany and Sweden are currently facing. So, you are for a more simplified version of country immigration?
|
|